Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
>On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 16:41 +0200, Jasse Jansson wrote:
>
>
>>>>So shouldn't everything in /usr/sfw that has the same name as an
>>>>existing thing in /usr be moved to /usr/gnu (after officially
>>>>defining it) or shouldn't we just redefine the role of /usr/sfw
>>>>and not create /usr/gnu?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Although I normally like to reuse stuff, I think we should
>>>
>>>
>>introduce
>>
>>
>>> /usr/gnu as a precise way of identifying the "alternative commands
>>> environment" it represents.
>>>
>>>
>>Shouldn't an "alternative commands environment" live in /opt ???
>>In this case /opt/gnu
>>
>>
>
>/opt is for add-on packages, things that are not shipped as
>part of the operating system.
>
>If these commands were not part of Solaris, they would go into
>/opt (in this case /opt/gnu), but the proposal is to include them
>in Solaris, so they need to go into /usr (/usr/gnu).
>
>Laca
>
>
What about having something under /opt (/opt/newergnu?) that mirrors
all the GNU tools in /usr/bin and /usr/gnu/bin, but with the latest
("bleeding
edge") versions?
Eric
P.S. This messages changes subjects, and accordingly I've sent it only
to companion-discuss
