Steve Christensen wrote: > Danek - > > As I stated in my response to Paul, the old form of the copyright seems to > occur in a number of copyright files. I will change these in a one new > submission. > > The GPL is not always included in its full form. If this needs to be done, I > will > do that along with the fixes for the Sun Copyright. > > I would prefer to do this after SFWter is reincluded if you and Paul approve.
That's okay with me paul > > >>I note that a bunch of the copyright statements >>aren't in the currently >>correct form. Even if this is how they were when the >>files were deleted, >>they probably should be updated, though I'd leave the >>copyright year alone. >> >>Isn't one of the issues with not integrating these >>terminfo files into the >>WOS that their copyright is likely GPL? If that's >>the case, then why isn't >>the copyright file a copy of the GPL? >> >>Otherwise, it looks fine. >> >>Danek >>_______________________________________________ >>companion-discuss mailing list >>companion-discuss at opensolaris.org >>http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-disc >>uss >> > > -- > This messages posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > companion-discuss mailing list > companion-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss >
