On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Kirill Subbotin wrote: > Derick Rethans wrote: > > > I've done a bit of research, and we can't use the "simple" version > > here, as libxml can not use that for validation. The leaves us with > > either XML Schema or RelaxNG (normal). I tried trang on our linguist > > files, and the results for both schemas can be found as attachments. > > (Also the corresponding .rnc). > > > I think the question here is what to use for discussions in the list. > > RelaxNG is good as an internal format for components, but the most > > human-readable are DTD and compact RelaxNG. So probably we could > > discuss it in these formats and then convert to RelaxNG for usage.
True, and as RelaxNG-c is more descriptive than DTD, we can discuss it here as relaxng-c, but we should store in svn relaxng. (luckily the formats can be very easily converted with this trang thing). regards, Derick -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
