Tobias Schlitt schrieb: > On 07/06/2007 11:18 PM Kore Nordmann wrote: > >> +1 for RelaxNG (Surprise! Surprise!) >> And >> +1 for RelaxNG-c for discussions. > > Works for me, although I am in general more a fan of XML Schema than of > RelaxNG. Anyway, seems RelaxNG is more accepted here, so we can go with > that. Because of that: > > +0 from me.
XMLSchema has one advantage in my eyes over RelaxNG. There are more tools out there (like mappers etc) and most parsers will be able to handle XML Schema. But can they all handle RelaxNG? (I know phps DOM does, but whats with the rest of the world?). This means for example that we could deliver our Schema directly to the browser or an external application and we can be pretty sure they can handle it. The browser could would know that this document is invalid and report it and another application which wants to import into our format could validate it before submitting this data. So from my side +1 for Schema. Cheers. -- With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vennlig hilsen Tobias Struckmeier System developer eZ systems Headquarters tel +49 (0) 231-9742-7753 | fax +49 (0) 231-9742-7751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no ****************************************** eZ systems GmbH Emil-Figge-Str. 76-80 44227 Dortmund Germany/Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Ralf Rutke Handelregister: AG Dortmund, HRB 18800 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.ez.no Tel: +49 (0) 231-9742-7750 Fax: +49 (0) 231-9742-7751 ****************************************** -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
