Hmm... isn't that a bit obfuscated? How are people supposed to know (without looking in the docs) what the purpose is for each of them?
What exactly (short in your words) does the new one do? Frederik On 22/04/2009, Tobias Schlitt <t...@ez.no> wrote: > Hi all, > > so far, the interface of ezcPersistentSession is only fixed by our BC > standards. Now that ezcPersistentIdentitySession is introduced, we'll > need to have an interface that both of these will implement, to be able > to store them in ezcPersistentSessionInstance. Since > ezcPersistentSession (the most logical choice for the interface name) is > already taken, I'd suggest ezcPersistentObjectSession. > > Any comments? > > Regards, > Toby > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vennlig hilsen / With kind regards > > Tobias Schlitt (GPG: 0xC462BC14) eZ Components Developer > > t...@ez.no | eZ Systems AS | ez.no > > -- > Components mailing list > Components@lists.ez.no > http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components > -- Components mailing list Components@lists.ez.no http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
