Hideki Kato wrote:
Gian-Carlo Pascutto: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hideki Kato wrote:
delta_komi = 10^(K * (number_of_empty_points / 400 - 1)),
where K is 1 if winnig and is 2 if loosing. Also, if expected
winning rate is around 50%, Komi is unmodified.
I don't think the formula you posted is correct.
It's just an experimental formla with no theoritical basis. I don't
think we can discuss its "correctness."
Even if it's a heuristic the outcome should be sensible. For what you
posted it doesn't seem to be at all. So I think that what you posted is
not what is in the program. That is what I mean by "correct".
In the opening it gives delta_komi = 0.8 and in the endgame it gives
delta_komi = 0.1.
I'm sorry but I don't understand what do you want to say. Too
small?
Yes. I don't understand how it can do anything if it adds _at most_ 0.8
points difference.
Should it have been 10* instead of 10^ or something?
--
GCP
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
