sorry to self-reply, but: > alternatively, it does sphere packing over the direct product of open > or closed (but bounded) intervals and discrete sets, so you can get a > set of points that is slightly better than a random set of experiments > (i.e. guaranteed to cover the space well).
arguably it is not slightly better, but much, much better. especially when the dimensionality (number of parameters) is high. s. _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
