That's pretty impressive for the go language if this is an apples to apples comparison. Is it pretty much?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Brian Slesinsky <br...@slesinsky.org>wrote: > Oops, you're right. Here it is with -server: > > Plug-and-Go refbot: 17857 > CRef bot (-O3) 12500 > Gongo 10000 > Java bot: 10000 > CRef bot (no optimization) 5882 > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Mark Boon <tesujisoftw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The relative values look about right. But I remember getting much > > higher numbers. Did you run the Java versions with or without the > > -server parameter? > > > > Mark > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Brian Slesinsky <br...@slesinsky.org> > wrote: > >> Okay, I added a few more timings (playouts / second, very rough): > >> > >> Plug-and-Go refbot: 14700 > >> CRef bot (-O3) 12500 > >> Gongo 10000 > >> Java bot: 6500 > >> CRef bot (no optimization) 5882 > >> > >> Note that Gongo and Plug-and-Go are using different board data > >> structures than the others. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> computer-go mailing list > >> computer-go@computer-go.org > >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > computer-go mailing list > > computer-go@computer-go.org > > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
