I did not test 100k playouts, I was lower than 2k playouts in all my
tests. No I am not sure we are stronger than Fuego, I should run on
KGS... (possibly after the 19x19 tournament on sunday)
We won against hirabot (1d if playing with 10k playouts on KGS I think)
in 19x19 slow bot tournament and played about even with aya and pachi in
13x13.
The winrates may depend strongly on the opponent: On CGOS with 1k we
have quite different winrates against aya_1k and fuego_10k or pachi_10k,
which are about equal strong there.
I am not sure, what to learn from this. For me it means, it might be
very difficult to compare the playing strength, as CNN has very
different strengths
Detlef
Am 29.04.2015 um 18:06 schrieb Aja Huang:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Aja Huang <ajahu...@google.com
<mailto:ajahu...@google.com>> wrote:
Interesting, but I don't really understand your experiments. Our
12-layer CNN alone is about KGS 2k, and when integrating it into
MCTS our program using very simple playouts is as strong as Fuego
(about KGS 1.5d to 2d). Are you sure their CNN is stronger?
You might misunderstand the paper. In Section 6, our MCTS program
integrated with the 12-layer CNN, running 100k playouts per move,
scores 86.7%+-3.5 against the 12-layer CNN alone, which is close to
Fuego's win rate described in Section 5. Also, note that our MCTS
program's playouts are much faster than Fuego so it can be stronger
than Fuego when playing fixed time per move.
Aja
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
