In the press conference (https://youtu.be/l-GsfyVCBu0?t=5h40m00s), Lee Sedol said that while he saw some questionable moves by AlphaGo in the first game, he feels that the second game was a near-perfect play by AlphaGo and he did not feel ahead at any point of the game.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:44:23PM +0200, Petri Pitkanen wrote: > This time I think game was tougher. Though too weak to judge. At the end > sacrifice a fistfull stones does puzzle me, but again way too weak to > analyze it. > > It seem Lee Sedol is lucky if he wins a game > > 2016-03-10 12:39 GMT+02:00 Petr Baudis <pa...@ucw.cz>: > > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:05:48PM -0800, David Fotland wrote: > > > I predicted Sedol would be shocked. I'm still routing for Sedol. From > > Scientific American interview... > > > > > > Schaeffer and Fotland still predict Sedol will win the match. “I think > > the pro will win,” Fotland says, “But I think the pro will be shocked at > > how strong the program is.” > > > > In that case it's time for Lee Sedol to start working hard on turning > > this match around, because AlphaGo won the second game too! :) > > > > Petr Baudis > > _______________________________________________ > > Computer-go mailing list > > Computer-go@computer-go.org > > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go -- Petr Baudis If you have good ideas, good data and fast computers, you can do almost anything. -- Geoffrey Hinton _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
