The same here, with other people having built the foundations of go AIs, and going from neural networks to MCTS, and now back-ish again... But that is how is how science works. Eventually these two wins are the reward of decades of culminated work by many people working on go AI. AlphaGo is the Cherry on the enormous cake.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Marco Scheurer <ma...@sente.ch> wrote: > Congratulations indeed. > > Although I must admit I have mixed feelings about this, that it is Google, > using enormous resources, that got there first. > > marco > > On 10 Mar 2016, at 19:38, Lukas van de Wiel <lukas.drinkt.t...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Congratz to AlphaGo, once more! > This is getting scary! :-) > > Lukas > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:40 AM, "Ingo Althöfer" <3-hirn-ver...@gmx.de> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> Von: "Erik van der Werf" <erikvanderw...@gmail.com> >> > Very impressive results so far! >> >> indeed, almost unbelievable. >> >> >> > If it's going to be a clean sweep, I hope we will get to see some >> handicap games :-) >> >> >> I have another proposal, IF a clean sweep will happen: >> There was an announcement three days ago by a Chinese group that >> they are developing a strong go bot and want to challenge >> No. 1 player Ke Jie (still in 2016). >> The winner of that match might challenge AlphaGo. >> >> Ingo. >> >> >> http://senseis.xmp.net/?KeJie >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Computer-go mailing list >> Computer-go@computer-go.org >> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >> > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
