Robert, This is exactly why I think the "explanation of the suggested moves" requires a much deeper baking into the participating ANN's (bottom up approach). And given what I have read thus far, I am still seeing the risk extraordinarily high and the payoff exceedingly low, outside an academic context.
However, if someone was to do all the dirty work setting up all the infrastructure, hunt down the training data and then financially facilitate the thousands of hours of human work and the tens to hundreds of thousands of hours of automated learning work, I would become substantially more interested...and think a high quality desired outcome remains a low probability. Jim On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Robert Jasiek <jas...@snafu.de> wrote: > On 31.03.2016 13:43, Bill Whig wrote: > >> Joseki learning requires much more than move suggestions. >>> >> Prove it. >> > > Read my four joseki books and my two books on positional judgement for a > proof. Hints: global context, evaluation, strategic choices, tactical > reading, many strategic concepts etc. All these are required for good human > joseki play and (far) beyond move suggestions. > > -- > robert jasiek > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
