Seeing the evaluations would seem to be counter to the international rules of pair go,
"4. Prohibition on exchanging information During the game, partners must not communicate, give advice, or exchange other information by speech, gestures, mannerisms, or any other means except playing moves. Speaking is permitted, however, to confirm whose turn it is to play or to confer about resigning. Conferring about resigning is limited to the following case: the player to move may ask for his or her partner's consent to resign; the partner may agree or not agree to resign." from http://www.pairgo.or.jp/setumei/rule.htm -Erin On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:57 AM, "Ingo Althöfer" <3-hirn-ver...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Magnus, > > thanks for the link. > > From my point of view the following part in the program > will be very interesting: > > “Pair Go” — A game where one Chinese pro will play > > against another...except they will both have their own > > AlphaGo teammate, alternating moves, to take the concept > > of ‘learning together’ quite literally. > > Will the pro players in these games see the evaluations > of AlphaGo? And also the principal line(s) ? > > ************************************* > In Jena we did preliminary exeriments on this setting > two or three years ago, with Crazy Stone being the bot. > > One insights: Assume A = AlphaGo, B = human_1, C = human_2 > where B is two stones stronger than C. > > This does not necessarily mean that team A+B will be > stronger than A+C. > > Ingo. > > Von: valky...@phmp.se > > > > https://deepmind.com/blog/exploring-mysteries-alphago/ > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
