Hi;
>> C*RAVE+(1-C)*UCT >> > > This has been my understanding. However, I am surprized to find out that > people have been setting C close to one, according to Petr and Oliver's > postings, which is essentially AMAF. MF apparently is doing something > different. > > As explained by Aja, I did not mean that; I meant that we use UCT with a coefficient 0 in front of the UCB term +C_{uct} sqrt ( log( ...) / ...). Best regards, Olivier
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@dvandva.org http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go