to be fair, that was a very subtle situation. only two of the hundreds of kibitzers expressed anything like a correct solution.
s. On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Francois van Niekerk <flash.sl...@gmail.com> wrote: > If he could avoid every big blunder, then he'd probably be a rank or > two stronger. > -- > Francois van Niekerk > Email: flash.sl...@gmail.com | Twitter: @francoisvn > Cell: +2784 0350 214 | Website: http://leafcloud.com > > > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 17:05, Michael Williams > <michaelwilliam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This was a major blunder, IMO. I think John will win every game in which he >> avoids big ones like this. >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:04 AM, "Ingo Althöfer" <3-hirn-ver...@gmx.de> >> wrote: >>> >>> According to the experts the most decisive action was Zen's move >>> 122.f2 which increased the pressure on John's group in the >>> lower left, but was not addressed seriously enough by him. >>> Later this group went over Jordan. >>> At the end the score was +18.5 in favour of Zen. >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Computer-go mailing list >> Computer-go@dvandva.org >> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >> > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@dvandva.org > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@dvandva.org http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
