On Jul 26, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
While a few select people may have some overwhelming need for some
version of 'color accuracy' (whatever THAT is), most of us put that
lofty concept way down on our list. A good *looking* picture is much
more important. As well as weight and footprint.
Sure, take your advice from someone who says "'color accuracy'
(whatever
THAT is)."
Tony B simply does not appear to think that anyone needs to be
particularly concerned about digital images other than they be good
"looking." If the color out of the printer does not closely match the
color on the monitor, that is apparently fine as long as it still is
good "looking" in its own way. Unless, of course, there is an
"overwhelming" need for accuracy.
Steve
************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************
