mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
It's not broken. Works fine on windows, it's just a webmaster who is
shortsighted about his potential visitors.
Yes, it's broken.
The Internet is designed to be operating system and browser neutral,
within reason. I don't expect webmasters to make sites compatible with
1994 browsers, but newer sites should be compatible with fairly current
browsers and OS's, mostly following W3C standards.
Web developers who deliberately or ignorantly design sites that only
work in Internet Exploder for Windows have broken sites. There's no IE
for Macs beyond v.5 and no IE for Linux at all. IE for Windows 95/98
may not work with sites designed for IE/XP either. Designers with bad
code deserve to lose visitor and money.
Yes, of course it's broken. Ask the webmaster to fix the site.
Betty
************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************
