> That circuitous bit of English essentially says that Prefetch is a cache. > Maybe you should diagram the sentence?
Who has the problem with the syntax here? Not me. > I did it. I did not need a stopwatch to see the difference. A computer > that the user hated to use instantly became normal. Improvement was > better than 10 to 1. Yes, *in this particular instance* where the prefetch folder was actually the problem *for a long boot time*, it worked. Get 10 more PCs at random, time the boot and app load times, clear the prefetch folder and time boot and app load times again. Let me know how that goes. > Of course by your logic a cache is not a cache and something working is > not proof that it is working. I get it. Next you'll be telling us how > great Vista works. By your logic *anything* is a cache, which now could include a burlap sack of nickels or Miley Cyrus and that something that worked once on a lark is obviously the answer to everything. (I'm picturing Steve Martin saying "You need a good bloodletting!") Vista *does* work great (I know that runs counter to what PC says to Mac and god only knows how they could be wrong). I'm eagerly awating Windows 7. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
