Hold on, you need to give some warning so I can get my hip boots on before you start shoveling this much high end shite.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:01 AM, TPiwowar <t...@tjpa.com> wrote: > Looks like the price tag ($18M) is for 5 years of work with an ambitious > mission statement and new content constantly added. Our cons/neocons had > made it sound like it was for a weekend's work. They lied to us for 8 years > and I guess it is hard to break a habit. > > "Agencies are starting to see that government needs to be part of this > larger information ecosystem," said Sheila Campbell, co-chairwoman of the > Federal Web Managers Council. "Managing the Web isn't just managing the Web > site. It means putting the content out where people are on the Web." > > Great dot-gov Web Sites 2009 > http://gcn.com/Articles/2009/07/27/GCN-Great-Gov-Web-Sites-2009.aspx > > Go visit these government sites and enjoy a job well done! > > Don't miss the contrast between the really good government sites and the > shabby GCN site. Do note "aspx" at the end of the GCN URL. (ASP.NET is a > web application framework developed and marketed by Microsoft. Ho, ho, ho.) > > I have analyzed the code of some of these dot-gov sites and, as I wrote > before, they are very well crafted. Lots to learn from their example. > > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
