WFB is Tom's term for anyone who disagrees with him.  It's his way to end
the debate, anyone not agreeing with him is obviously a paid shill or WFB.

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Judy Cosler <jfcos...@gmail.com> wrote:

> WFBs = ????
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:46 AM, tjp <t...@tjpa.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> http://blogs.computerworld.com/14797/google_chome_add_in_for_ie_speed_demon_or_big_fat_security_hole
> >
> > "Google's just released Chrome add-in for Internet Explorer can speed up
> IE
> > by as much as 10 times, tests show. But if you listen to Microsoft, it
> also
> > leaves you more vulnerable to malware and Web-based attacks. Who should
> you
> > believe?"
> >
> > This is a variation on Google trying to take over and reengineer the
> iPhone
> > with GoogleVoice, except this time it is going after M$. My first
> reaction
> > is holy cow, are M$ programmers such jerks that Google can so easily
> speed
> > up IE by ten fold.  Then I wonder if our WFBs will so vigorously defend
> > Google now that the shoe is on the other foot.
> >
> >
> > *************************************************************************
> > **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
> > **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
> > *************************************************************************
> >
>
>
> *************************************************************************
> **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
> **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
> *************************************************************************
>


*************************************************************************
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*************************************************************************

Reply via email to