Stephen Warren wrote: > Phil Dibowitz wrote: > >> Lucas van Staden wrote: >> >>> http://www.dedmeet.com/files/safemode_xml_logs.zip >>> >> As for this, the only thing I can see is that they call RESET_USB before >> they start. It seems unlikely this is the the difference, but it's possible >> that we can add a "--rescue" option which will be un-picky about what >> endpoints the device has, issue a USB_RESET, and then disconnects and >> attempts to reconnect. I'm not convinced this will work, but it's the only >> thing I can think of. >> >> Steven, Kevin, et. al, see anything I missed? >> > > Looking at SnoopyProExportUSBLog1.log, I don't see any difference > compared to looking at the code in libconcord.cpp. > > The only things I can think of as possibilities: > > * fw_up_base == config_base on this remote; perhaps that's somehow relevant. > > * I didn't see the firmware file posted anywhere that Lucas loaded > through Windows. So, I can't compare the Windows USB log against the > ezup file. Maybe the Windows firmware updater for series 7 is modifying > more bytes between the ezup file and the flash writes than what > libconcord modifies; "checksum" and 4847 bytes? > Anything else I can run to get more data?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
