On 01/06/2013 08:39 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > >> Other than that, I think this looks great. I'd like to take one more look at >> it when it's not super late but I think other than the two minor things above >> we're good to go. > > Different thought. Congruity and libconcord currently differ a bit in how > they are describing the stages with strings. Congruity says, for example, > "Set Time" whereas libconcord has the string "Setting time." Any > preference on which way is better?
Ideally congruity would use the strings provided by libconcord's lb_cb_stage_str() function, which is what concordance uses. -- Phil Dibowitz p...@ipom.com Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912
_______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
