On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Phil Dibowitz wrote: >> In preparation for supporting IR learning for ZWave, change the IRLearn() >> function to be a subclass function for each so that IR learning can be >> implemented and easily merged for each type separately. > > I'm totally fine with this. Out of curiosity though, do you actually expect > there to be much of a difference? Since you can call Read() and Write() and > have them do the right thing, I would imagine they'd be roughly the same... > but if you've started digging and say they're likely to be pretty divergent, > we can go this path. If, however, it's the case where there's just one extra > step on one side or the other, it might be nice to keep them in one place...
Yes, I've started looking at this a bit and I think they are going to be fairly different implementations (especially with the whole UDP vs TCP mode of ZWave-HID and switching between the two). I actually started working on the USBNet version quite a while back, but I didn't get it working yet, and I have fairly limited access to that remote. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your SQL database under version control now! Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
