Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> Actually, rather than deprecate webjumps, I recently expanded the
> webjump architecture a bit, such that a completer can be specified for
> the argument to a webjump. In the process, I made the system aware of
> the difference between webjumps that take an argument and those that
> don't.
> To get the correct, you can use instead:
> define_webjump("buzz", "http://buzzflash.com";, $no_argument);
> (define_webjump is a nicer name, I think, though add_webjump remains an
> alias for define_webjump)
> I actually just pushed a fix, though, so that define_webjump/add_webjump
> called with template string that does not contain "%s" implies
> $no_argument anyway, so your original
I noticed that John preempted my fix with his own fix, but in any case
his fix does the same thing.
--
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
_______________________________________________
Conkeror mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
