On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:54:56PM +1030, David Kettler wrote: > I could have the text of the two xml files literally in the test suite > and modify the index-webjump to parse that text. Is that what you > mean? Maybe that's the best solution, but it will mean a little less > of the code is exercised by the test. > > You suggested chrome://conkeror-contrib elsewhere. How about also > having a chrome://conkeror-test something like the following. Then I > don't need conkeror_source_code_path. (I'd chop this into 2 or 3 > commits to push.)
Before adding a chrome domain for conkeror-test, I'd like to take a step back and just ask, does this really represent a qualitative improvement to our unit testing capabilities? What kinds of things does it let us test, beyond this particular case? -- John Foerch _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
