Axel Beckert <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 05:06:48PM +0800, zwz wrote:
>> However, in comparison to Emacs, I find Conkeror not-such-extensible
> [...]
>> 2. "shell-command" is not supported,
>
> Hmmm, I agree that this is maybe useful in a non-X-editor (but I've
> never used it in Emacs), but I can't imagine a useful application for
> that in a web-browser.

You're right. I cannot figure out an application scenario either. But it
makes some potential usage possible in future (like taking notes by
org-protocol which is supported now).


>
>>    and I cannot use emacsclient to edit the text field.
>
> Ehm, I do exactly that. Anu I'm sure many others, too. See
> http://conkeror.org/ExternalEditing for the detals. Emacsclient is
> even the example there.

Yes, I followed the instructions there. But the minibuf says "Your OS is
not yet supported".

>
>>    I just wonder if it is possible to assign a shell-program
>>    (variable) to enable shell-command, just like what emacs does.
>
> Sure. Both ways work. I would expect that this also works on Windows,
> but I've no idea what other constraints (like a working
> conkeror-spawn-helper) are possibly not satisfiable on Windows.

How do you assign a shell-program? There seems no such variable.

>
>               Kind regards, Axel

_______________________________________________
Conkeror mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror

Reply via email to