Hi,
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 06:46:33PM -0400, John J. Foerch wrote:
> Is anybody out there still using XULRunner 1.9.0.x, or able to offer a
> good reason why we should maintain compatibility with it?
Debian Oldstable (Codename "Lenny", supported until Feb 2012) has
xulrunner 1.9.0.
> There are things that could be simplified if we bumped our
> min-version requirement to 1.9.1.
But there are backports of xulrunner 1.9.1 available for Lenny, so if
anyone runs Nightlies on Debian Lenny (*pondering* No, I don't think I
do anymore :-), either an update to the current Debian Stable
(Codename "Squeeze") or the usage of xulrunner backports would be
necessary.
I think with moving to xulrunner 1.9.1 and above, even the Debian
packaging would benefit a little bit but getting a little bit easier.
:-)
Kind regards, Axel
--
/~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert
\ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | [email protected] (Mail)
X See http://www.asciiribbon.org/ | [email protected] (Mail+Jabber)
/ \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://noone.org/abe/ (Web)
_______________________________________________
Conkeror mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
