Hi,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 02:41:23PM -0400, John J. Foerch wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 06:46:33PM -0400, John J. Foerch wrote:
> > Is anybody out there still using XULRunner 1.9.0.x, or able to offer a
> > good reason why we should maintain compatibility with it? There are
> > things that could be simplified if we bumped our min-version requirement
> > to 1.9.1.
>
> Done.
Same counts now for the Debian packaging. From the next nightly build
on, the package requires at least xulrunner-1.9.1 installed.
P.S. to John WRT to mail delays: Your mail I'm replying to hung from
Thursday to Sunday on some mozdev.org server...
Kind regards, Axel
--
/~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert
\ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | [email protected] (Mail)
X See http://www.asciiribbon.org/ | [email protected] (Mail+Jabber)
/ \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://noone.org/abe/ (Web)
_______________________________________________
Conkeror mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
