On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 06:52:04PM +1030, David Kettler wrote: > > I like the names you've chosen for the modes. They make it obvious what > > their purpose is. > > > > The minibuffer-annotation system is of course a general system by design, > > so let's say down the road we add another feature that uses it - for > > example, ido-style inline completions. This poses a problem, because if > > this hypothetical feature were enabled, and a person then disabled > > hints-minibuffer-annotation-mode, minibuffer-annotation-mode should *not* > > be disabled, because it is still needed for the inline completions system. > > Any thoughts on how to deal with this eventuality? > > Good point. > > Something like minibuffer-annotation-mode represented by an object with > enable/disable methods, but also register/unregister methods. Each > feature would register itself with the mode. The mode can disable > itself when the list of registered features is empty. > > Regards, David
Will you code that up? -- John Foerch _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
