I don't agree.  I also should note that the quote in question from
President Tushnet's message is in a parenthical discussion in his personal
capacity as a constitutional law scholar and he states at the end of that
discussion that his "sense is that advocates of affirmative action may be
unduly nervous about reading the Court's decisions as aggressively as the
foregoing analysis suggests can be done, and the probably would be
prudent."  I applaud Mark for providing that caveat.

Scott

At 02:49 PM 9/15/03 +0000, you wrote:
>Professor Gerber:
>
>The Court clearly held, did it not, that considering race is a permissible
>means of producing a "critical mass" of underrepresented minority students
>in the student body as a whole.  Unless one is to argue that a university
>may only achieve such critical mass unintentionally, by fluke or
>coincidence, doesn't it naturally follow that a university may calibrate its
>consideration of race to enhance the likelihood of producing the critical
>mass it permissibly seeks?
>
>Trevor Morrison
>Assistant Professor of Law
>Cornell Law School
>
>
>
>>From: Scott Gerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Discussion list for con law professors
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: AALS president's message on affirmative action
>>Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 07:35:57 -0400
>>
>>I read with interest Mark Tushnet's president's message in the most recent
>>issue of the AALS Newsletter.  I disagree with Mark's thesis that the only
>>thing the Michigan decisions forbid is "mechanical" allocation of points
>>(as was done in the undergrad process).  I think the Court's decision was
>>that academic institutions are allowed to consider race as a factor in the
>>admissions process when making decisions about applicants who possess
>>roughly similar tests scores and grades, etc.  In short, I think the Court
>>adopted Justice Powell's approach in Bakke, and I think Mark's analysis is
>>much different than that of Justice Powell.  For example, I disagree with
>>Mark's statement that "if the number of offers extended suggested that the
>>school might fall short of its goal, the weight given race in the 'whole
>>file' review might increase to ensure that the target was met."  I know
>>Mark disagrees, but that sounds like a quota to me.
>>
>>Best wishes,
>>Scott Gerber
>>Law College
>>Ohio Northern University
>>**********
>>Scott Gerber
>>Law College
>>Ohio Northern University
>>Ada, OH 45810
>>419-772-2219
>>http://www.law.onu.edu/faculty/gerber/
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage.
>http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es
>
**********
Scott Gerber
Law College
Ohio Northern University
Ada, OH 45810
419-772-2219
http://www.law.onu.edu/faculty/gerber/

Reply via email to