On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 05:52:50AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > BTW, the proposal has also been discussed with the managers of the NTT > IRR database. I will not speak for them, but I believe that I can say > that they broadly agreed with our goals.
Yes, I'm sure that NTT, and myself, and you, all agree we want improve Internet routing security. However working towards this common goal is very different from RIPE as a community recommending a specific set of IRRDBs to be used or not to be used. NTT arguably has invested lots of resources to improve the status quo: deployment of RPKI ROV, kickstarting the IRRd v4 project, harmonizing RPKI filtering for IRR, ability to priotize one IRRDB over another, and always very conservative about which new IRRDBs to mirror. I'm trust most people would agree that each IXP operator has to make a conscious decision which IRRDBs to use or not to use, at the very least as a matter of local policy. Support for reduction of poorly managed IRRDBs (either by deploying more IRRd v4 or turning them off) and support for hygiene in the global routing system, probably do not equate support for this specific proposal in its current form. Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ connect-wg mailing list connect-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg
