On Jan 20, 2010, at 5:18 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > > > (a) Just the sources, ma'am. > (b) Sources plus the original makefile's, for reference. > (c) The complete debian package sources.
I'd say let's start with everything (as long as MetaCarta is fine with it) and then we can pare back if we need to. Otherwise, if we later decide it would be useful, then we would need to go through all of this again. > > Please let me know what you would think would be most appropriate. (Grant > Ingersoll has already chimed in with the opinion that more is better than > less at this point.) > > A similar question can be asked about tests MetaCarta has that exercise LCF > and individual connectors. These tests are written in python and expect to > be run on MetaCarta's appliance, but they could conceivably be useful as an > example. Should they be included in the grant? If you think it would be useful, that would be great. > > Also, FWIW, the grant will describe files as they appear in MetaCarta's > repository today. The presumption is that the files will be moved to their > proper location in the Apache world after the initial import into svn. You'll need to put up a tarball w/ an MD5 Hash (along w/ the version info on the md5 tool you used) that can be referred to publicly so that I can fill out the ASF paperwork on the grant. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-77. Once the grant is accepted, then we can work through committing it to SVN. > > A final procedural question involves what copyright, if any, should be on the > files submitted in the tar. I am definitely going to be removing the > MetaCarta copyrights; do I want to add Apache copyrights before the grant, or > not? That would be great if you could do it. > > Thanks, > Karl >
