you can ignore my vote really :) but i was thinking from a practical perspective, this one involves the least code changes.
plus, with existing projects named things like "apache DB" and "apache http server", i don't understand the fuss. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, you've made your feelings clear. ;-) > Karl > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Apache Connectors Framework > > Apache Connectors Framework > > Apache Connectors Framework > > > > (sorry) > > > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list > > > with > > > a selection, in order, of the top three names for the project currently > > > known as Apache Connectors Framework. The choices > > > are: > > > > > > Apache Connectors Framework > > > Apache Acromantula > > > Apache Manifold > > > Apache ManifoldCF > > > Apache Multiplex > > > Apache Lucon > > > Apache Lukon > > > Apache Yukon > > > Apache Macon > > > Apache Omni > > > Apache Omnivore > > > Apache CMCF (yes, I just invented that one ;-) ) > > > Apache Multivore (yes, I just invented that one too. ;-) ) > > > > > > I don't think I missed any? If I did, chastise me severely please. ;-) > > > > > > Karl > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Robert Muir > > rcm...@gmail.com > > > -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
