I think its pretty clear that unless the lords of the incubator *force* us to do otherwise, we should just leave it as Apache Connectors Framework. The vote is going to end up reflecting that is my bet anyway. I havn't seen anyone that's actually involved (if you can say anyone beyond karl is really involved anyway) is really dying for a change.
- Mark On 8/31/10 8:07 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > you can ignore my vote really :) > > but i was thinking from a practical perspective, this one involves the least > code changes. > > plus, with existing projects named things like "apache DB" and "apache http > server", i don't understand the fuss. > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Well, you've made your feelings clear. ;-) >> Karl >> >> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Apache Connectors Framework >>> Apache Connectors Framework >>> Apache Connectors Framework >>> >>> (sorry) >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list >>>> with >>>> a selection, in order, of the top three names for the project currently >>>> known as Apache Connectors Framework. The choices >>>> are: >>>> >>>> Apache Connectors Framework >>>> Apache Acromantula >>>> Apache Manifold >>>> Apache ManifoldCF >>>> Apache Multiplex >>>> Apache Lucon >>>> Apache Lukon >>>> Apache Yukon >>>> Apache Macon >>>> Apache Omni >>>> Apache Omnivore >>>> Apache CMCF (yes, I just invented that one ;-) ) >>>> Apache Multivore (yes, I just invented that one too. ;-) ) >>>> >>>> I don't think I missed any? If I did, chastise me severely please. ;-) >>>> >>>> Karl >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Robert Muir >>> rcm...@gmail.com >>> >> > > >
