Piergiorgio wants to include a section in the "how to build and deploy" documentation for the Alfresco connector. To me this is not really an important enough change to spin another RC, but since we're still waiting for Tommaso to review our releases there may be time to do it.
But, right now, I vote +1 for RC0. We'll see if Piergiorgio withdraws his vote. Karl On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Shinichiro Abe <shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you. I understand. > > +1 for me. > > Shinichiro Abe > > On 2011/12/19, at 16:25, Karl Wright wrote: > >> The hsqldb configuration used by multiprocess-example is an external >> hsqldb database. It does not require the >> org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath property. If you want to try >> out the multiprocess example, take the following steps: >> >> (1) In one shell prompt, start the database: "start-database.bat/.sh" >> (2) In another shell prompt, initialize the database: "initialize.bat/.sh" >> (3) When that is done, start the agents proces: "start-agents.bat/.sh" >> >> Thanks, >> Karl >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Shinichiro Abe >> <shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I checked 0.4 by running ant test, okay but one problem. >>> >>> In multiprocess-example, at default properties.xml, HSQLDB database requires >>> 'org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath' property, containing a relative >>> path: >>> >>> <property name="org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath" value="."/> >>> >>> Now exception is thrown, so we need to add this property. >>> Should I send a patch? Next? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Shinichiro Abe >>> >>> On 2011/12/18, at 2:27, Karl Wright wrote: >>> >>>> I've again uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you >>>> can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree >>>> this should be released please vote +1. >>>> >>>> [Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of >>>> the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change >>>> those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please >>>> note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per >>>> Jukka's suggestion.] >>>> >>>> I apologize again for the earlier hiccup. This one is the real thing, >>>> though, and passes all tests. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Karl >>> >
