Hi Tim, > > But its just a small patch from my side so i really don't care as long as i > > can send the variants to the interface :-). > > > > Also i think these patches are already applied to the repository by Daniel > > Wagner (haven't had the time to check), so i am a little usure how to > > proceed? > > actually I think your patches are actually wrong. I started looking > through this again. We already recurse into a variant here. > > So why do you wanna send sv where v is another v container? Are you sure > your client is not doing something utterly wrong here. > > I just looked at the clock interface here. And that one was correct from > what the documentation said.
so your patch has been reverted. I have no idea why this is needed for you, but in this case you are doing something wrong in the client. Regards Marcel _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
