Hi Patrik, On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Patrik Flykt <patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com > wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:41 +0200, laurent vaudoit wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Patrik Flykt < > patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 16:52 +0200, laurent vaudoit wrote: > > > > So i've made a little modification in plugin/ethernet.c (inspired > from > > > > the vlan management). > > > > The evolution consist in checking if the interface use the dsa > driver, > > > > and in this case, add to service name the switch port number (as > > > > connman add the vlanid to the service name). > > > > > > What exactly is this dsa driver? Is it upstream or provided by a > vendor? > > > > > dsa is the "distributed switch architecture" driver, which is upstream. > > under this there is the chip driver for the switch, who communicate > trhough > > mdio interface with the chip. > > In my case, it is a new developped driver as the chip was not supported > by > > kernel, but there is allready some driver existing (marvell for example) > > source code is under net/dsa/ > > Sounds like a plan. Send a patch after you have tested it. > We are running some test and most of our use case are ok. The only thing we do not understand, is that if the dhcp cleitn do not get an ip adress, we were expecting that the board get an ip in 169.254... through link local? Is there something we missed? > > Cheers, > > Patrik > Regards Laurent > > _______________________________________________ > connman mailing list > connman@connman.net > https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman > _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
