On 1 March 2013 09:39, Hugo Roy <[email protected]> wrote: > Le dimanche 17 février 2013 à 13:16 +0100, Hugo Roy a écrit : > > I think we should change the terminology to avoid confusion. This isn't > > necessarily about "personal data" but about "user data" as the manifesto > > title suggests. (in most occurrences of the text, it simply menas to > > write "their data") > > > > Here are my suggestions attached > > > > > > Hi, > > Any comment on these suggestions? > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/consensus/2013-02/txtZ5VLz15Cr2.txt >
(1) and (4) are not 100% the same To my mind (1) talks about read access, and (4) talks about write access (modify). I think you need both, because data becomes less useful when you are restricted from changing some or all of it. > > I was reading it again quickly now. And I have come to the conclusion > that the manifesto's format should be changed. I think we only need 3 or > 4 main points; all the rest should be explained to give details on the > point, from both the technical and rights standpoints (people on the > list made good suggestions from the technical side, maybe it's time to > merge them…) > > I am looking forward to your thoughts on that > > Best, > -- > Hugo Roy > FSFE Legal Team Deputy Coordinator > FSFE French Team Coordinator > Support Free Software, sign up! https://fsfe.org/support > > >
