Fixed in latest version (1.4.19) - all packages and binaries are updated. Your testcase hit 2 separate bugs.
-- Tino Didriksen On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 at 23:09, Paul Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to do several attachments in a WITH block. > > In the sentence > > A B C > > I want to get > > C -> A > B -> C > > I try this rule set: > > WITH ("C") > IF (-2 ("A")) > (-1 ("B")) > (NOT p (*)) { > SETPARENT (*) TO (jC1 (*)) ; > SETPARENT _C2_ TO (0 (*)) ; > } ; > > but it does only do the first attachment C -> A. > > Is there something wrong with my syntax; can this be done at all? > > I tried a variant: > > WITH ("C") > IF (-2 ("A")) > (-1 ("B")) > (NOT p (*)) { > SETPARENT (*) TO (jC1 (*)) ; > SETPARENT _C2_ TO (jC1 (*)) ; > } ; > > This does work and gives me C -> A, C -> B. (This is however not what I > need.) > > - Paul Meurer > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Constraint Grammar" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/constraint-grammar/2E8A2888-CF60-4C77-BEDB-667F69654C5E%40uib.no > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Constraint Grammar" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/constraint-grammar/CABnmVq6x0PbaKi39%2BpsBMuYnQFNdUQevpUYQNkCda8tPvhoeZQ%40mail.gmail.com.
