Worth investigating - though I'd prefer we move to a trigger rather
than poll based build if we can, and move the poll to daily in case a
trigger gets missed.
Also, remember not all SCMs support this (eg, CVS).
- Brett
On 16/01/2007, at 12:54 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
I think we need to change the changes check. Actually, we do an
update on all projects to check if we have changes.
It will be better to use the status command (I don't know if this
command exist in all SCM), but with svn, we'll can use 'svn status -u'
I think the changes check will improve performance when working
copy is up-to-date
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
That doesn't actually matter for the client side speed boost. I'm
running 1.4.2 on continuum now.
- Brett
On 15/01/2007, at 2:21 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
The svn.apache.org server is a little old too: Powered by Subversion
version 1.3.1 (r19032).
-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 6:46 PM
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Trusting in our own dog food
yeah, it's subversion 1.1.4 (ouch!).
I'm going to look at upgrading!
On 11/01/2007, at 11:27 PM, Federico Yankelevich wrote:
I read on svn changelog that SVN v1.4 increased a lot the speed for
comparing local copy with repository.
Maybe continuum is very slow in SVN update because it is using SVN
1.3 (both
client and server needs to be updated)
see http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.4_releasenotes.html
just my 2 cents,
Federico
brettporter wrote:
Yes, I have a script to automate installing the latest build
(though
would need changes if continuum_ci was turned off).
1.1 is running very well thanks to some sleuthing by Wendy and
quick
fixes from Emmanuel.
My biggest concern is the scalability of polling. It currently
takes
about 30 minutes to just run through all the required svn up
commands
to detect if builds are needed for all the Maven projects.
- Brett
On 11/01/2007, at 10:26 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
good luck ;-)
did you update the 2.1 snapshot ?
Arnaud
On 1/11/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
I'd like to turn off continuum_ci.sh and instead only use
Continuum
itself to do CI for Continuum. Any objections?
- Brett
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Trusting-in-
our-
own-dog-food-tf2955860.html#a8276485
Sent from the Continuum - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
