I'm pretty sure it does. The speed boost is due to a new diff algorithm that both sides must use. You can also get some size improvements if you dump/reimport the data into a new repository. On our repos it was around 20%.
-----Original Message----- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 10:35 PM To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Trusting in our own dog food That doesn't actually matter for the client side speed boost. I'm running 1.4.2 on continuum now. - Brett On 15/01/2007, at 2:21 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: > The svn.apache.org server is a little old too: Powered by Subversion > version 1.3.1 (r19032). > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 6:46 PM > To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org > Subject: Re: Trusting in our own dog food > > yeah, it's subversion 1.1.4 (ouch!). > > I'm going to look at upgrading! > > On 11/01/2007, at 11:27 PM, Federico Yankelevich wrote: > >> >> I read on svn changelog that SVN v1.4 increased a lot the speed for >> comparing local copy with repository. >> Maybe continuum is very slow in SVN update because it is using SVN >> 1.3 (both >> client and server needs to be updated) >> >> see http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.4_releasenotes.html >> >> just my 2 cents, >> Federico >> >> >> >> brettporter wrote: >>> >>> Yes, I have a script to automate installing the latest build (though >>> would need changes if continuum_ci was turned off). >>> >>> 1.1 is running very well thanks to some sleuthing by Wendy and quick >>> fixes from Emmanuel. >>> >>> My biggest concern is the scalability of polling. It currently takes >>> about 30 minutes to just run through all the required svn up >>> commands > >>> to detect if builds are needed for all the Maven projects. >>> >>> - Brett >>> >>> On 11/01/2007, at 10:26 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: >>> >>>> good luck ;-) >>>> did you update the 2.1 snapshot ? >>>> >>>> Arnaud >>>> >>>> On 1/11/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Folks, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to turn off continuum_ci.sh and instead only use >>>>> Continuum > >>>>> itself to do CI for Continuum. Any objections? >>>>> >>>>> - Brett >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Trusting-in-our- >> own-dog-food-tf2955860.html#a8276485 >> Sent from the Continuum - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
