well, if you want to have a plugin based architecture, what better that OSGi? and it may help too for distributiion of build machines
On Feb 6, 2008 2:08 AM, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you thinking what I am thinking - an OSGi based runtime underneath > and plugins/extensions that could be loaded runtime? > :-) > > > Carlos Sanchez wrote: > > Some comments > > > > Database vs xml: definitely database. Throwing away the db access api > > (JDO/JPA/...) now that it's already there doesnt make much sense. > > Maybe there are implementations that use xml for storage and that's > > where you'd need to look if you want file storage > > > > Spring vs Guice vs Plexus: Spring for sure. Big community, lots of > > users, documentation, support,... Specially if you want to add JMX > > support (can be done really easily just with annotations using > > reflection), and thinking in OSGi in the future I'm sure it will be > > really easy to integrate Spring and OSGi if it is not already. I'd > > start softly, just migrating thing that would require adding features > > to plexus, and move from there. > > > > I agree with Brett on having 1.2, 1.3,... it's good to have a list of > > what you want to do for 2.0 but as it gets done it should be released > > in minor versions. > > > > On Jan 29, 2008 2:34 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> I started a document [1] with my ideas about Continuum 2. > >> As you can see in this doc, I want to add lot of things in the next > >> version. > >> > >> Feel free to comment on it. > >> > >> > >> [1] > >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/Continuum+2.0+Design+Discussion > >> > >> Emmanuel > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride
