It is more than 300 characters of custom properties with their values set using 
-D parameters.  However, I decided to use less characters, thus I am fine for 
now.  Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 7:30 AM
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build definitions which exceed the default length

Can we know values you use in this screen?

Emmanuel

Morgovsky, Alexander (US - Glen Mills) a écrit :
> Sure.  
> 
> On the Add/Edit Build Definition page, after entering the definition, I
> receive this error:
> 
> org.apache.maven.continuum.ContinuumException: Error while executing the
> action 'update-build-definition-from-project-group'
> 
> The Stack Trace contains:
> 
> Caused by: javax.jdo.JDOFatalUserException: Attempt to store value "<my
> definition>" in column "ARGUMENTS" that has maximum length of 256.
> Please correct your data!
> 
>       at
> org.jpox.store.rdbms.mapping.CharRDBMSMapping.setString(CharRDBMSMapping
> .java:214)
>       at
> org.jpox.store.mapping.SingleFieldMapping.setString(SingleFieldMapping.j
> ava:203)
>       at
> org.jpox.store.rdbms.fieldmanager.ParameterSetter.storeStringField(Param
> eterSetter.java:122)
>       at
> org.jpox.state.StateManagerImpl.providedStringField(StateManagerImpl.jav
> a:2757)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.continuum.model.project.BuildDefinition.jdoProvideField
> (BuildDefinition.java)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.continuum.model.project.BuildDefinition.jdoProvideField
> s(BuildDefinition.java)
>       at
> org.jpox.state.StateManagerImpl.provideFields(StateManagerImpl.java:3115
> )
>       at
> org.jpox.store.rdbms.request.UpdateRequest.execute(UpdateRequest.java:25
> 9)
>       at
> org.jpox.store.rdbms.table.ClassTable.update(ClassTable.java:2573)
>       at org.jpox.store.StoreManager.update(StoreManager.java:967)
>       at
> org.jpox.state.StateManagerImpl.flush(StateManagerImpl.java:4928)
>       at
> org.jpox.AbstractPersistenceManager.flush(AbstractPersistenceManager.jav
> a:3217)
>       at
> org.jpox.store.rdbms.RDBMSNonmanagedTransaction.commit(RDBMSNonmanagedTr
> ansaction.java:397)
>       at
> org.codehaus.plexus.jdo.PlexusJdoUtils.updateObject(PlexusJdoUtils.java:
> 163)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.continuum.store.JdoContinuumStore.updateObject(JdoConti
> nuumStore.java:794)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.continuum.store.JdoContinuumStore.updateObject(JdoConti
> nuumStore.java:786)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.continuum.store.JdoContinuumStore.storeBuildDefinition(
> JdoContinuumStore.java:707)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.continuum.core.action.AbstractBuildDefinitionContinuumA
> ction.updateBuildDefinitionInList(AbstractBuildDefinitionContinuumAction
> .java:181)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.continuum.core.action.UpdateBuildDefinitionFromProjectG
> roupAction.execute(UpdateBuildDefinitionFromProjectGroupAction.java:51)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.continuum.DefaultContinuum.executeAction(DefaultContinu
> um.java:2432)
>       ... 81 more 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 9:34 PM
> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Build definitions which exceed the default length
> 
> On Nov 24, 2007 7:23 PM, Morgovsky, Alexander (US - Glen Mills)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Continuum does not allow build definitions to be longer than a
> specified
>> length.  What is the suggested work-around for this issue?  Thank you.
> 
> There are several fields on the add/edit build definition page.  Is
> one of the fields too short, or is it accepting your input and then
> complaining later?
> 
> Please explain the steps needed to reproduce the problem.
> 


This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information 
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. 


Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any 
action based on it, is strictly prohibited. [v.E.1]

Reply via email to