Thanks, I will try this. -----Original Message----- From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 8:27 AM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Build definitions which exceed the default length
it would be better to use a profile instead of to use all properties on the command line. Emmanuel Morgovsky, Alexander (US - Glen Mills) a écrit : > It is more than 300 characters of custom properties with their values set > using -D parameters. However, I decided to use less characters, thus I am > fine for now. Thank you. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 7:30 AM > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Re: Build definitions which exceed the default length > > Can we know values you use in this screen? > > Emmanuel > > Morgovsky, Alexander (US - Glen Mills) a écrit : >> Sure. >> >> On the Add/Edit Build Definition page, after entering the definition, I >> receive this error: >> >> org.apache.maven.continuum.ContinuumException: Error while executing the >> action 'update-build-definition-from-project-group' >> >> The Stack Trace contains: >> >> Caused by: javax.jdo.JDOFatalUserException: Attempt to store value "<my >> definition>" in column "ARGUMENTS" that has maximum length of 256. >> Please correct your data! >> >> at >> org.jpox.store.rdbms.mapping.CharRDBMSMapping.setString(CharRDBMSMapping >> .java:214) >> at >> org.jpox.store.mapping.SingleFieldMapping.setString(SingleFieldMapping.j >> ava:203) >> at >> org.jpox.store.rdbms.fieldmanager.ParameterSetter.storeStringField(Param >> eterSetter.java:122) >> at >> org.jpox.state.StateManagerImpl.providedStringField(StateManagerImpl.jav >> a:2757) >> at >> org.apache.maven.continuum.model.project.BuildDefinition.jdoProvideField >> (BuildDefinition.java) >> at >> org.apache.maven.continuum.model.project.BuildDefinition.jdoProvideField >> s(BuildDefinition.java) >> at >> org.jpox.state.StateManagerImpl.provideFields(StateManagerImpl.java:3115 >> ) >> at >> org.jpox.store.rdbms.request.UpdateRequest.execute(UpdateRequest.java:25 >> 9) >> at >> org.jpox.store.rdbms.table.ClassTable.update(ClassTable.java:2573) >> at org.jpox.store.StoreManager.update(StoreManager.java:967) >> at >> org.jpox.state.StateManagerImpl.flush(StateManagerImpl.java:4928) >> at >> org.jpox.AbstractPersistenceManager.flush(AbstractPersistenceManager.jav >> a:3217) >> at >> org.jpox.store.rdbms.RDBMSNonmanagedTransaction.commit(RDBMSNonmanagedTr >> ansaction.java:397) >> at >> org.codehaus.plexus.jdo.PlexusJdoUtils.updateObject(PlexusJdoUtils.java: >> 163) >> at >> org.apache.maven.continuum.store.JdoContinuumStore.updateObject(JdoConti >> nuumStore.java:794) >> at >> org.apache.maven.continuum.store.JdoContinuumStore.updateObject(JdoConti >> nuumStore.java:786) >> at >> org.apache.maven.continuum.store.JdoContinuumStore.storeBuildDefinition( >> JdoContinuumStore.java:707) >> at >> org.apache.maven.continuum.core.action.AbstractBuildDefinitionContinuumA >> ction.updateBuildDefinitionInList(AbstractBuildDefinitionContinuumAction >> .java:181) >> at >> org.apache.maven.continuum.core.action.UpdateBuildDefinitionFromProjectG >> roupAction.execute(UpdateBuildDefinitionFromProjectGroupAction.java:51) >> at >> org.apache.maven.continuum.DefaultContinuum.executeAction(DefaultContinu >> um.java:2432) >> ... 81 more >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 9:34 PM >> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Build definitions which exceed the default length >> >> On Nov 24, 2007 7:23 PM, Morgovsky, Alexander (US - Glen Mills) >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Continuum does not allow build definitions to be longer than a >> specified >>> length. What is the suggested work-around for this issue? Thank you. >> There are several fields on the add/edit build definition page. Is >> one of the fields too short, or is it accepting your input and then >> complaining later? >> >> Please explain the steps needed to reproduce the problem. >> > > > This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information > intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If > you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. > > > Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of > any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. [v.E.1] > >
