Katherine --

I think that the way you were doing the ballroom swing before you modified it 
is not how most of the rest of us do it, and that this in itself produces some 
of the problems your modification solves.

I'm sure under the impression that the 'standard' ballroom swing [*] has the 
robin's arm on top

Here's a video (from the East Coast) whcih sure looks to me (from the West 
Coast) like how we do it out here.

https://youtu.be/lQ0R5iHT-l8?si=OYKTgBXg0dLyKQza

(Of course there has to be some adjustment for height difference, and you don't 
want a tall person having to bend way forward and then support a short person 
or a short person getting their shoulders stretched by reaching way up; your 
modification (robin's hand goes on upper arm rather than shoulder blade) is 
sometimes the best solution for height differences even when the default hold 
is 'standard' as shown in the video.

Please try the 'standard' hold with your husband and see if it's any better for 
you that what you were using..  And then we can at least all be talking about 
the same thing.

I say "some of the problems" because I think the appropriate solution for 
creepy dancers lies in counseling or ejecting them rather than in changing the 
hold, because creepy guys gonna creep regardless of the hold.  It's really only 
a solution for people who are dancing too close for comfort and don't realize 
it, and I think the solution for that is for people they are making 
uncomfortable to either tell them or tell management and have management tell 
them.

I  don't see why in either hold anybody should be grabbing you by the waist.  I 
also think that there's going to be some irreducible minimum of innocent / 
unintended boob and butt grazes, especially among unsure dancers - the chances 
of a new dancer in a courtesy turn having their behind-the-back hand in an 
unexpected place and the other person, trying to take that hand (which they 
can't even see, by the way)  is going to end up putting their hand on hip, 
waist, or butt.;  Do you want to change the courtesy turn hold to avoid that?  
Because you don't have to interoperate with other dances, you could change the 
courtesy turn hold into a hands-in-front promenade hold and avoid that risk)

On a pedantic note, I've been having trouble understanding the hold before you 
posted the picture, because "modified ballroom swing" is, as I recall, what 
Larry Jennings ("Zesty Contras", "Give and Take") called what we've been 
calling the ballroom hold because it's a modification of the position for 
ballroom dances like waltz and polka, that modification being that the inside 
of the feet being square-on to partner, or slightly offset so that you 
intentionally step between your partner's feet; when you're in the 
ballroom-dance hold, of course to rotate you alternate stepping forward and 
stepping backward.  Modified to fully offset, you both step forward the whole 
time.

(One of the reasons an ex of mine hated contra dancing was that she'd fully 
internalized the step-between-the-feet thing in foxtrot, one step, waltz, etc, 
and if you try to do that in a contra swing the results are somewhere between 
unsatisfactory and actively dangerous.)

Anyway, as a result, the arm that goes to the partner's shoulderblade is 
necessarily stretched to some degree across the front of your partner's body - 
more stretched if your and your partner's feet are further apart, less 
stretched if they're closer together - and it's much easier for that arm to 
contact the front of the partner's body somewhere in the boob area than it is n 
a square-on ballroom hold.

As far as I can tell -having only fairly-small man boobs -  you can manage to 
reduce the impact by adjusting the angle at which partners are facing and how 
close your the right side of your right foot is to the right side of theirs.  
All the stuff that you'd naturally want to do to avoid unintended forearm-boob 
interaction is, counterintuitively, unhelpful so long as you're keeping the 
shoulder contact  - you want to keep your distance so you keep your feet 
further away, and that changes the angle, reducing the clearance between arm 
and boob.  Or you want to pull the shoulder near the grazed boob back -recoil 
from the touch, or whatever - and that also makes it worse because it changes 
the angle and brings more boob surface into contact with the arm.  
Counterintuitively, adjusting things so that the pointy-end side is farther 
apart helps by increasing clearance on the blunt-end side where the boob 
contact is happening because it brings you closer to square-on, reducing the 
arm-boob a
 ttack surface.

-- Alan (hoping this doesn't completely come across as mansplaining)

________________________________________
From: Katherine Kitching via Contra Callers 
<contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2024 2:27 PM
To: Katherine Kitching
Cc: Jeff Kaufman via Contra Callers
Subject: [Callers] Re: Modified ballroom swing position: seeking more 
conversation and info

Sorry everyone - I am clearly not the global authority on this hold, just yet!! 
:D

 I just tested this out at home with my (life) partner and realized something 
unexpected-

In the case of me and my partner dancing, it was actually better for both of us 
if his arm went below mine even though he is taller-  I guess because he is 
taller, his upper arm is also longer, so somehow it still made sense for my arm 
to go on top. (If anyone thinks they can better explain the physics/physiology 
of this, be my guest!)

Anyhow we got a photo - he is camera-shy and made me crop out his face, but I 
think you can view it here - let me know if any issues.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ebotfe2jksbr3dqbjyiuf/Modified-Ballroom-Swing-elbow-hold.jpg?rlkey=ekblzvpc2tk2hkbtfrh9u96au&dl=0

Let's call this hold a "work in progress" from us at Halifax Contra Dances- 
seems we are still sorting out some details!! :)

Kat K
Katherine Kitching<mailto:k...@outdooractive.ca>
Wednesday, March 13, 2024 6:09 PM
whoops whoops!! sorry, correction on that.

the photo on Jeff's page shows the arms that are closest to the viewer, in the 
photo, in a similar position to what my group has been using.

But I just noticed the dancer's other arms are not hand-in-hand, like my group 
does it.
Darn :)

We would still have Lark's Left hand in Raven's Right hand.

KK



_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-le...@lists.sharedweight.net

Reply via email to