Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Michael Irving wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> > > I've just put wu-ftpd 2.6.0 [pre2] in Cooker.
> > > Please test this package thoroughly and let me know of any problems...
> > > Unless any major bugs turn up, we'll release it by Friday... [Speaking for
> > > the wu-ftpd development group here, not for Mandrake]
> >
> > Have you totally stopped developing bero ftpd?
>
> BeroFTPD and wu-ftpd have been merged together again.
> The only reason I started BeroFTPD was that wu-ftpd seemed to be pretty
> much stalled - a new release only every few months, not integrating any of
> the fixes or new features people like myself posted on the lists.
>
> After 2.4.2beta17, things started to be different, there was wu-ftpd
> stock, which was stalled, there was wu-ftpd-vr, Gregory Lundberg's version
> of what the daemon should be, and BeroFTPD, my version of what it should
> be.
>
> Since more and more people got annoyed with this, the old maintainer was
> finally ruled out and starting with 2.5.0, wu-ftpd was transfered to an
> open development group led by Gregory and myself.
>
> The 2.6.0 version is all about getting the BeroFTPD features and fixes
> back into wu-ftpd, and I have CVS write access to the tree, so I don't see
> a need to work on BeroFTPD anymore because basically wu-ftpd 2.6.0 =
> BeroFTPD 1.4.0.
>
> I'll probably release a wu-ftpd 2.6.0 version I just repackaged as
> BeroFTPD 1.4.0 just so people see where we're headed. ;)
>
> LLaP
> bero
>
> --
> Tired of waiting for Windows 2000?
> STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/
So then I assume kBeroFTPD will continue to be available and is supposed to work
with wu-ftpd-2.60 as well?
SK
