On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
>
> > Kaixo!
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 02:22:34PM +0100, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> >
> > > > mozilla-5.0-0.13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and mozilla-5.0-0.13.2mdk,...
> > > make that mozilla-5.0-0.m13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and ....
> >
> > Why not 0.M13 ? M13 is more meaningful than m13 (at least for me)
> >
> > > How about CVS versions?
> >
> > Should we release CVS versions ?
> > I think milestones are out often enough that we don't need to put out CVS
> > versions. (and people that really want them knows how to get the CVS sources,
> > how to make a tarball out of them, and type rpm -b ...)
> >
> > > Any suggestions on how to name them? mozilla-5.0-0.cvs20000225?
> > >
> > > Stefan
> >
> > --
> > Ki ça vos våye bén,
> > Pablo Saratxaga
> >
> > http://www.ping.be/~pin19314/ PGP Key available, key ID: 0x8F0E4975
>
> Well as of current the CVS version of last night is a hell of a lot more stable
> the M13 is, M13 was about as stable as running windows;) but as of feb 25th the
> CVS release is stable enough to use day to day, so untill m14 comes out I would
> sugest that we go with a cvs copy possibly.... would make it possible to just
> install and start using in replacement for netscape.
>
> -DarkWlf
If its as stable as you mentioned... why not
I would like to 'replace' netscape asap ;o)
would it be available as rpm or tar file? (or both)
Sergio
--
M A N D R A K E
"The friendliest LINUX Distro"
Time is in Our Side
---------------
Distribuidores de los productos Alaska
http://www.alaska.com.mx
Linux en Español
------------
