Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, obennett wrote: > > > > > >>I think that would be a good fix but "Save" rather than "Close" (as > >>gnome does) would be more appropriate here as it explains to the lay > >>user exactly what is/has been done. > > > > > > Not really. The reason that GNOME uses 'Close' and not 'Save' or something > > else, is that it uses instant-apply where possible. So the changes have > > already been effectuated before closing the window. > > > > Which means if you made a mistake, you can't just choose cancel (or hit > ESC), you have to remember what setting you had before, and set it back > to that. Really bad UI IMHO. Expect users to make mistakes often, and
Yes but it's already the case. You already can't go back. I know it's not optimal but the current architecture of edit-urpm-sources and urpmi.* make it difficult to do otherwise. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
