Steffen Barszus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...] > > isdn4linux scripts will allways be bloated once you have the most common > options running. Its a common flaw of isdn4linux. Once you beginn with a > small script and you add this and that, you will have in the and again a > bloated script or you do not support the most common uses of isdn4linux. > Further it is a pain to support isdn under mandrake if you first have to > determine which version the people have running. (I mean support on > mandrakeexpert here) > ok, then let's go for isdn4linux :) > [ ... ] > >> besides these modifications, are the mdk isdn4net script correct? do they >> work with drakconnect correctly? Is there a list of supported isdn cards by >> drakconnect+isdn4net ? > > Beside that drakconnect and isdn4net should work without problems. > > I could try to figure out wich cards should work with isdn4net and > drakconnect, faster I could make a list of supported cards of isdn4net alone. > Am I right that all modules that van be found in ldetect-lst with "ISDN:*" > should be known to isdn4net to support all cards ? yes, exactly. Be carefull, one ISDN card has a firmware, and this is written in the pcitable: "ISDN:hisax,type=28,firmware=/usr/lib/isdn/ISAR.BIN" > > If there were cards that worked with isdn-light and not with isdn4net i would > like to know about it, so i can support it with isdn4net. For me isdn4net > worked allways better then isdn-light. The only thing I can see is the firmware loading. One should check that configuring the Speed Fax+ PCI from Sedlbaueur works (with firmware loading) when configuring it with drakconnect + isdn4net > Further I have added an option to fast > add unsupported cards. > > As you know the scripts I guess you understand the following. > > 'ippp*') > echo "Loading driver defined in modules.conf ..." > /sbin/modprobe -v $I4L_MODULE >/dev/null > if test $? -ne 0; then > cleanup > fi > ;; > > A driver ippp0 can be added with an alias to the correct driver in > modules.conf. > >> If it works as good as it worked with isdn-light, I'll do the modifications > > Again if there were known problems with isdn4net that i do not know about i > would love to hear about it, so i can fix it. I would say it works as good as > isdn-light. I haven't heard the opposite. > > I will send the src.rpm to you per PM ok. I'll do the modifications then, and ask for the src.rpm to be included in main after I review it. I'll do all that tonight or tomorrow. Regards -- dams
