Tom Oehser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If tomsrtbt is going to be considered, it would probably be good to get we would like to include it for the next version, but now we are in completely deep freeze. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.mandrakesoft.com . --Chmouel
- Re: [Cooker] Tomsrtbt Alan Shoemaker
- [Cooker] Init hassle Paul Dorman
- Re: [Cooker] Init hassle Paul Dorman
- Re: [Cooker] Init hassle Sebastian Dransfeld
- Re: [Cooker] Tomsrtbt Anton Graham
- Re: [Cooker] Tomsrtbt Ian C.Sison
- Re: [Mandrake] Re: [tomsrtbt] Re: [Cooke... Tom Oehser
- Re: [Mandrake] Re: [tomsrtbt] Re: [C... Ian C.Sison
- Re: [Cooker] Tomsrtbt Civileme
- [Cooker] tomsrtbt Tom Oehser
- Re: [Cooker] tomsrtbt Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] tomsrtbt Alan Shoemaker
- Re: [Cooker] tomsrtbt Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] tomsrtbt Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] tomsrtbt Alan Shoemaker
- Re: [Cooker] tomsrtbt Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] tomsrtbt David Talbot
- Re: [Cooker] tomsrtbt Alan Shoemaker
- Re: [Cooker] tomsrtbt David Talbot
- Re: [Cooker] tomsrtbt Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] tomsrtbt diablero